Compare Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs. Gemini 1.5 Pro

Pricing About Us Blog Docs

Compare

to

Understand and compare Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs. Gemini 1.5 Pro

Turn your documents into engaging podcast discussions.

Overview

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct was released 5 months after Gemini 1.5 Pro.

	Llama 3.1 70B Instruct	Gemini 1.5 Pro
Provider The entity that provides this model.	Meta	Google
Input Context Window The number of tokens supported by the input context window.	128K tokens	1M tokens
Maximum Output Tokens The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.	2,048 tokens	8,192 tokens
Release Date When the model was first released.	July 23rd, 2024 4 months ago 2024-07-23	February 15th, 2024 9 months ago 2024-02-15
Knowledge Cutoff Limit on the knowledge base used by the model.	December 2023 December 2023	November 2023 November 2023
Open Source	Yes	No
API Providers The providers that offer this model. (This is not an exhaustive list.)	Azure AI, AWS Bedrock, Google Cloud Vertex AI Model Garden, NVIDIA NIM, IBM watsonx	Google Cloud Vertex AI Model Garden

Pricing

	Llama 3.1 70B Instruct	Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input Cost of input data provided to the model.	Pricing not available.	$7.00 per million tokens
Output Cost of output tokens generated by the model.	Pricing not available.	$21.00 per million tokens

Benchmarks

Compare relevant benchmarks between Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Gemini 1.5 Pro.

	Llama 3.1 70B Instruct	Gemini 1.5 Pro
MMLU Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.	83.6 (5-shot) Source	81.9 (5-shot) Source
MMMU A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.	Benchmark not available.	58.5 (0-shot) Source
HellaSwag A challenging sentence completion benchmark.	Benchmark not available.	93.3 (10-shot) Source
GSM8K Grade-school math problems benchmark.	95.1 (8-shot) Source	90.8 (11-shot) Source
HumanEval A benchmark to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings.	Benchmark not available.	84.1 (0-shot) Source
MATH Benchmark performance on Math problems ranging across 5 levels of difficulty and 7 sub-disciplines.	68.0 (0-shot) Source	67.7 (4-shot Minerva Prompt) Source

Compare more models

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs.

GPT-3.5 Turbo 1106

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs.

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs.

Llama 3 8B Instruct

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs.

Llama 3 70B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs.

Claude Instant 1.2

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs.

o1 Mini 2024-09-12

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs.

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs.

GPT-4 Turbo 2024-04-09

Measure & Improve LLM Product Performance.