Understand and compare
GPT-4 Turbo 0125
vs.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Try
Podial
Turn your documents into engaging podcast discussions.
Overview
GPT-4 Turbo 0125 was released
5 months before
Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
GPT-4 Turbo 0125
|
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
|
OpenAI
|
Anthropic
|
|
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
|
128K
tokens
|
200K
tokens
|
|
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
|
4,096
tokens
|
4,096
tokens
|
|
Release Date
When the model was first released.
|
2024-01-25
|
2024-06-20
|
|
Knowledge Cutoff
Limit on the knowledge base used by the model.
|
December 2023
|
April 2024
|
|
Open Source
|
|
|
|
API Providers
The providers that offer this model. (This is not an exhaustive list.)
|
|
|
Pricing
GPT-4 Turbo 0125 is
roughly 3.3x more expensive compared
to Claude 3.5 Sonnet for input tokens and
roughly 2.0x more expensive
for output tokens.
|
GPT-4 Turbo 0125
|
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
|
$10.00
per million tokens
|
$3.00
per million tokens
|
|
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
|
$30.00
per million tokens
|
$15.00
per million tokens
|
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between GPT-4 Turbo 0125
and Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
|
GPT-4 Turbo 0125
|
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
|
85.4
(5-shot)
|
90.4
(5-shot CoT)
|
|
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
|
Benchmark not available.
|
68.3
(0-shot CoT)
|
|
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
|
Benchmark not available.
|
Benchmark not available.
|
|
GSM8K
Grade-school math problems benchmark.
|
Benchmark not available.
|
Benchmark not available.
|
|
HumanEval
A benchmark to measure functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings.
|
86.6
(0-shot)
|
Benchmark not available.
|
|
MATH
Benchmark performance on Math problems ranging across 5 levels of difficulty and 7 sub-disciplines.
|
64.5
(0-shot)
|
71.1
(0-shot)
|
Llama 3 70B Instruct
Measure & Improve LLM
Product Performance.
Get Started
© 2023-2024 Context