Understand and compare
Gemini Flash
vs.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Overview
Gemini Flash was released
about 1 month before
Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
Gemini Flash
|
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
|
Google
|
Anthropic
|
|
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
|
1M
tokens
|
200K
tokens
|
|
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
|
8,192
tokens
|
4,096
tokens
|
|
Release Date
When the model was first released.
|
2024-05-14
|
2024-06-20
|
Pricing
Gemini Flash is
roughly 24x cheaper compared
to Claude 3.5 Sonnet for input tokens and
roughly 40x cheaper
for output tokens.
|
Gemini Flash
|
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
|
$0.13
per million tokens
|
$3.00
per million tokens
|
|
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
|
$0.38
per million tokens
|
$15.00
per million tokens
|
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemini Flash
and Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
|
Gemini Flash
|
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
|
78.9
(5-shot)
|
90.4
(5-shot CoT)
|
|
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
|
56.1
(0-shot pass@1)
|
68.3
(0-shot CoT)
|
|
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
|
Benchmark not available.
|
Benchmark not available.
|
GPT-4o 2024-05-13
Mistral Large
Measure & Improve LLM
Product Performance.
Get Started
© 2023-2024 Context